The Trump administration has filed a petition with the U.S. Supreme Court, challenging lower court rulings that limit the President’s ability to remove commissioners of independent agencies, particularly the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The case centers on FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, whom President Trump attempted to dismiss without cause — a move that has sparked significant debate about presidential authority and agency independence.
Philadelphia Eagles’ Jalen Carter Ejected for Spitting on Dak Prescott in NFL Season Opener
What Happened?
In early 2025, President Trump sought to remove FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter without citing misconduct or neglect of duty. However, lower courts ruled that such removal without cause violates long-standing legal protections designed to maintain the independence of federal agencies like the FTC, which oversees consumer protection and regulatory enforcement.
The appeals court upheld this ruling, citing the 1935 Supreme Court case Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, which established that independent agency members cannot be removed at the President’s discretion but only for specific reasons such as wrongdoing. This precedent ensures that agencies like the FTC, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) operate without direct political pressure.
Who Is Affected?
Rebecca Slaughter, appointed by President Trump in 2018 and later re-appointed by President Biden, is currently the only Democrat serving on the FTC. Her removal would have tipped the commission’s balance toward the President’s party. The case is widely seen as a test of the independence of the FTC and other federal bodies that need protection from political interference.
Background and Legal Timeline
The Trump administration’s request to the Supreme Court follows a series of court decisions defending the independence of agency commissioners. The Department of Justice argues that the President should have the authority to remove commissioners at will, claiming that executive control is essential for governing effectively.
If the Supreme Court revisits or overturns the Humphrey’s Executor precedent, it could reshape the balance of power between the executive branch and independent regulatory bodies — potentially subjecting them to greater presidential influence.
Public and Social Media Reaction
The case has drawn attention from legal experts, political analysts, and watchdog groups. Many warn that removing protections for independent agencies could open the door to excessive political control over regulatory decisions. Others argue that stronger presidential authority is necessary to ensure accountability and effective governance.
The debate highlights concerns about maintaining checks and balances within the federal government and preserving agency independence from partisan influence.
What Happens Next?
The Supreme Court has not yet confirmed whether it will take up the case, but its decision could redefine the way federal agencies function. A ruling in favor of the Trump administration could allow future presidents to exert more control over commissions like the FTC, FCC, and SEC.
As the case proceeds, stakeholders across the legal and political spectrum are closely watching to see whether the courts uphold longstanding protections or expand presidential power.
Conclusion
The outcome of this case could have profound implications for separation of powers, federal governance, and the independence of regulatory bodies in the United States. As the Supreme Court prepares to review the case, the decision will likely shape the future of executive authority and agency oversight for years to come.
This story will be updated with more information as it becomes available.
1 thought on “Trump Administration Asks Supreme Court to Rule on Presidential Power to Remove FTC Commissioner”